The comments came after the United States warned that it could carry out additional military strikes if a diplomatic agreement with Tehran is not reached.
The Iranian official suggested that such statements, often delivered through public remarks and social media, risk complicating already fragile negotiations and heightening instability in the region.
The remarks reflect longstanding concerns in Tehran over President Trump’s reliance on direct and often provocative messaging, particularly through social media platforms.
Iranian officials have repeatedly argued that such communication methods can undermine formal diplomatic channels and contribute to misunderstandings during sensitive geopolitical situations.
The latest exchange occurs against the backdrop of heightened tensions in the Middle East, where both countries remain at odds over security, nuclear policy, and regional influence.
According to recent developments, Iranian representatives have also expressed frustration with what they describe as “maximalist demands” from Washington, which they say hinder progress toward meaningful dialogue.
AP News
Despite intermittent signals of possible diplomatic progress, both sides continue to exchange sharp rhetoric.
Analysts note that while public statements may serve domestic and strategic purposes, they also risk escalating the situation if not matched by constructive engagement behind closed doors.
As the situation evolves, international observers are closely monitoring whether both nations can move beyond public posturing toward substantive negotiations that could ease tensions and prevent further military confrontation.